Thursday, June 21, 2007

Dumber by the Dozen

Here’s a good reason to limit yourself to one child: His/her sibling(s) will not be as intelligent.

This is the kind of theory that has been around for years. Robert Zajonc, a social psychologist, is famous in many fields for his birth order theory of intelligence. Benefiting from their parents’ exclusivity, firstborns interact with adults more than any subsequent offspring. Until a sibling comes along, firstborns grow in a highly intellectual family environment. Secondborns, on the other hand, interact more with their sibling than their parents and so forth.

This theory is obviously debated. But today, a Norwegian study confirmed that firstborns are indeed smarter. In fact, firstborns’ IQ is on average 2.3 points higher than their younger siblings. Like Zajonc, Dr. Petter Kristensen of the National Institute of Occupational Health in Oslo attributes this difference to social rank (and not genetics). Firstborns enjoy the undivided attention of their parents and do not have to share the family resources.

When I cited Zajonc as a reason why I did not want more than one child (if at all), my gynecologist laughed it off. Who’s laughing now, doctor!?!

5 comments:

doctor T said...

What happens if both parents are dumb?

Foxy Renard said...

I read this and was wondering what kind of a actual difference a 2.3 point higher IQ actually makes. Thoughts?

Ms.Smarties said...

For everyday life, 2.3 points probably doesn't make a big difference. On an LSAT, GMAT, or GRE, I think it can make all the difference!

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.